|
Post by MTMT on Dec 1, 2009 1:20:53 GMT -4
From NoDQ.com:
I am all for this.
ECW is a great brand in that it shows the future, and has some damn good wrestling- both of new and old.
But the fact that it's called "ECW" has been my issue from the start. Now, I never watched ECW back in the day... but I've seen enough clips and know enough about it that I don't blame Paul Heyman for hating the current product. It kind of shits on his legacy. There's nothing particularly "Extreme" about it.
So what should they call it?... Thoughts?
|
|
|
Post by AWA Staff on Dec 1, 2009 3:58:02 GMT -4
Tuesday Night Heat
WWE Velocity 2
WWE 'Not Quite' Superstars
lol
|
|
|
Post by SLAM II on Dec 1, 2009 11:53:27 GMT -4
sudden-push but then drop superstar extravganza supershow tuesday night weed fest!
SBTDSESTNWF!!! ROCK-SOME!!!
KEV-land RULZ!!!
|
|
|
Post by theegomjw on Dec 1, 2009 12:08:38 GMT -4
'If you get moved from RAW or SD to this show your career is in the pan'
IYGMFROSTTSYCIITP'
Has a nice ring to it
|
|
|
Post by James Lucas on Dec 1, 2009 12:14:25 GMT -4
I am sure you are all fans of wrestling. I am too. I love WWE. I grew up in the late 80's, but barely remember them. I watched wrestling in the late 80's and 90's. Those were the days. I also loved the original ECW. It was raw. It was hardcore. It was extreme. WWE's version of ECW is boring. There have been some good wrestlers there, but using the name ECW is stupid. I also think the name Smackdown is stupid. Raw is a cool name. The others are stupid. Not sure what name they will go with, but I'm hoping if they change it, they give it a cool name.
|
|